Women’s unequal world

Published Wednesday, March 11, 2009 2:34 PM

Sudan and Afghanistan are among countries whose traditional social institutions result in the highest levels of discrimination against women, while Croatia and Paraguay are among those with the lowest levels of discrimination, according to the Social Institutions and Gender Index (SIGI) of 102 non-OECD countries.

Unlike existing measures of inequality which show women’s  educational attainment, health or economic and political participation, the SIGI index looks at the causes  inequalitysocial institutions, codes of behaviour, traditions and formal and informal laws. As the map below shows, many of the countries with the worst discrimination and gender inequality are found in a belt stretching from Mali to Pakistan. In most parts of sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and the Middle East and North Africa region, women face high levels of discrimination and inequality in social institutions. The darker the colour the higher the inequality index. 

 

 

The index measures the prevalence of such practices as early marriage, polygamy and  female genital mutilation and the extent of freedom of movement, of dress, of parental authority and of violence against women. Other indicators taken into account include access to land, property and credit. 

The Social Institutions and Gender Index has been constructed by the OECD Development Centre, in collaboration with a research team from Göttingen University under the leadership of Professor Stephan Klasen. More information can found at www.oecd.org/dev/gender/sigi.
Filed under: , ,

Comments

# the king said on Tuesday, March 24, 2009 11:03 AM

very true

# Lucas Hainsworth said on Thursday, April 16, 2009 6:42 AM

While I understand and appreciate that there is severe injustice in the world and that women should enjoy the access to freedom and liberty that men have,

I feel that to assume that Males and Females are inherently the same type of beings is to deny reality. The argument isn't "1 man = 1 woman" or "1 man > 1 woman" but "1 human = 1 human" and women are not provided with the opportunities that the men are to actualise their dreams.

Equality implies parity and while this is true, no human is more valuable than any other - I feel the values that you are trying to measure can be somewhat intangible when you are comparing people across cultures and national boundaries.

Rather than calling it a measure of womens "inequality" why not call it a prejudice or discrimination index.

Then you could extend it into more objects than just womens affairs, but things like wealth disparity and lack of access to education etc.  

# Hannah Smith said on Monday, May 04, 2009 3:58 PM

I surprised that I don't see Saudi Arabia at the bottom of the list, furthermore, that this country appears with a very light colour!

# Fei Sha said on Monday, May 11, 2009 3:33 PM

I'm amused that your "study" assigns the same index to China and Algeria. Has anyone of you has actually been in China to see what happens there?

# Nicolas said on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 9:21 AM

I am also quite surprised to see South Korea and Japan in a light color especially when the study is supposed to take into account social institutions, codes of behaviour, and traditions, which are bigger impediments than formal or informal laws. Was it counterbalanced by "the extent of freedom of movement, of dress".  What were the key indicators of the study? What is the background of the people involved in the study? this would be very interesting additionnal information

# Nicolas said on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 9:23 AM

my mistake. the page was not fully loaded the first time. I can see the link to the full study

# Nicolas said on Thursday, May 14, 2009 8:21 AM

To Fei Sha: I actually came across this yesterday. It should give new insights to some of your interrogation why China is rated so low

www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Chinas_sticky_floor_2354